Below
is a list of succesful legal actions which have been carried out by innocent
protestors against violent police officers. Out of fear of further violence
and intimidation being inflicted on them and on legal advice a number of cases
have not been mentioned on this page, others have simply passed us by. This
is very much the tip of the iceberg but leaves us with a scenario whereby
the police break the law while trying to 'contain' the animal rights message
while at the same time calling for more powers to clamp down on animal rights
protests and then send cheques to their victims of their crimes to the tune
of hundreds of thousands of pounds. This catalogue adds up to well in excess
of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS and that doesn't even begin to get close
to the total figure given away to the animal rights movement and spent on
legal costs. With all the cases there are pending and those we have no definate
details on, this figure could reach a million pounds any day in compensation
payments alone.
One example of a matter on which we cannot elaborate is the case of a young
mother hospitalised by police brutality on her first ever demonstration in
1999. She is still suffering immensely as a result. Another example, also
taking place in 1999, is a man in his fifties, who was arrested so violently
that his arm was broken. Even so he was left with handcuffs on. He had committed
no crime and does not face any charges, but he is still unable to work due
to his injury. There's the West County anti-hunt campaigner who was arrested
for failing to give his details to police but at the station was re-arrested
for causing cruelty to animals by blowing a hunting horn which the police
said would be distressing for animals to hear! Two weeks later the charges
were dropped and civil proceedings begun. There are many many other incidents
to call upon where civil cases are pending, animal abusers are on trial for
attacking pepole and where pepole who have put themselves in the firing line
between animals and abusers have been attacked and had their property damaged
or dead animals left on the doorstep. But the point is made, we feel, by relying
on what the courts have been good enough to agree with us on thus far. It's
time, if there is a genuine concern about addressing violence in this violent
society, to focus as much energy and expense on the perpetrators of violence
against real livesas is dedicated to stiffling legitimate protest.